Skip to content
The Magnolia DocketMississippi civil litigation

How a Case Moves

Civil Trials and Appeals in Mississippi

How a Mississippi civil trial is structured, how a twelve-person jury reaches a verdict, and how an appeal reaches the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court.

An empty courtroom in a small Mississippi county seat, wooden benches and a raised judge's bench, tall windows with drawn blinds.
An empty courtroom in a small Mississippi county seat, wooden benches and a raised judge's bench, tall windows with drawn blinds.. Illustration produced for this magazine; it does not depict a specific case or party.

Very few civil cases reach a verdict, and even fewer are appealed. The trial is the part the public pictures, and the appeal is the part that shapes the law, but both sit at the end of a long process that has already resolved most disputes. Understanding how a Mississippi civil trial is structured, and what an appeal can and cannot do, explains why the system works the way it does.

Getting to trial

A case is set for trial only after the pleadings close, discovery ends and any dispositive motions are decided. Before trial the judge holds a pretrial conference and enters a pretrial order that fixes the claims, the defences, the witnesses and the exhibits. Anything left out of that order may be excluded. The parties also exchange jury instructions and verdict forms, which is where much of the real argument about a case happens.

The path that leads here, from the complaint through discovery, is set out in How a Civil Case Moves Through Mississippi Courts.

The jury in a civil case

A civil trial in circuit court is heard by twelve jurors, plus alternates, unless the case is tried to the judge alone. Chancery court is different: trials are typically heard by the chancellor without a jury, though state law allows a jury in certain chancery matters. In county court the jury is smaller.

Mississippi does not demand a unanimous verdict in a civil case. Under Rule 48 of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure, the agreement of nine or more jurors is taken as the verdict of the jury. The judge instructs the jury on that rule when a party asks. This is a long-standing feature of Mississippi practice, and it distinguishes a civil verdict from a criminal one, where all twelve jurors must agree.

The order of a trial

Jury selection comes first. The lawyers question a panel of prospective jurors, and each side may remove a limited number for cause and a limited number without stating a reason. Peremptory challenges cannot be used to strike jurors because of race or sex.

Then come opening statements, which are not evidence but a preview of what each side expects to prove. The plaintiff presents its witnesses and exhibits first, and the defendant may cross-examine each witness. When the plaintiff rests, the defendant may move for a directed verdict, arguing that no reasonable jury could find for the plaintiff. If that motion fails, the defendant presents its own case, and the plaintiff may offer rebuttal evidence. Closing arguments follow, and then the judge instructs the jury on the law.

Burdens and verdict forms

A civil plaintiff must prove the case by a preponderance of the evidence, meaning that the claim is more likely true than not. That is a lower burden than the criminal standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and it is why civil and criminal cases arising from the same event can reach different results. In a case involving fault, the verdict form typically asks the jury to assign a percentage of fault to each party, and the judge applies the comparative fault rule afterwards.

The fault rule itself is explained in Personal Injury and Comparative Fault in Mississippi.

After the verdict

A verdict is not the end. The losing party may file post-trial motions, including a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a motion for a new trial. The judge may reduce an excessive award, a step called remittitur, or order a new trial on damages alone. If those motions fail, the judgment becomes final and the clock on an appeal starts.

The appeal: what it is and is not

An appeal is a review of the record, not a new trial. The appellate court asks whether the trial judge applied the law correctly and whether the evidence supported the result. It does not hear witnesses, and it generally will not second-guess a jury's view of the facts. New evidence is almost never allowed, which is why everything that matters must be in the record before trial ends.

To appeal, a party must file a notice of appeal with the clerk of the trial court. Under Rule 4 of the Mississippi Rules of Appellate Procedure, that notice must be filed within thirty days after entry of the judgment or the order appealed from. Another party may cross-appeal within fourteen days after the first notice. Missing the thirty-day window generally ends the right to appeal, and the appellate courts treat the deadline as jurisdictional. The clerk of the appellate courts publishes the filing requirements, including the docket fee.

Which court hears the appeal

Mississippi has a two-tier appellate system. The Court of Appeals, created by the Legislature in 1994 and hearing cases since 1995, is an error-correction court: it decides appeals in which the law is settled and the facts are disputed. It has ten judges elected from five districts. The Supreme Court, with nine justices elected from three districts, is the court of last resort. It keeps certain categories of case for itself, including death penalty appeals, election contests, utility rates and challenges to the constitutionality of a statute, and it may take a case from the Court of Appeals on certiorari, which requires the affirmative vote of four justices.

Statute sets a target for decisions: the Court of Appeals is to decide each case within 270 days after the final briefs are filed, and the Supreme Court faces a similar requirement in its original jurisdiction.

What an appeal can change

An appellate court may affirm, reverse, or reverse and remand for a new trial or further proceedings. It may also remand with instructions, which limits what the trial court can do next. Because the standard of review favours the trial court on questions of fact and the jury on questions of credibility, many appeals end in affirmance. That is not a defect. It is the predictable result of a system that places fact-finding in the trial court and keeps the appellate role narrow.